The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law (IJIL) commits to fair, transparent, and responsible editorial practices. The journal provides a formal mechanism for receiving and addressing complaints concerning its editorial processes and the conduct of individuals involved in publication, as well as appeals against editorial decisions.
This policy draws on established principles of publication ethics, including relevant guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). It complements IJIL's Peer Review Policy, Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement, and Retraction and Correction Policy.
This policy applies to complaints and appeals relating to the journal's editorial and publication activities.
Complaints may concern, but are not limited to:1. Alleged irregularities in editorial or peer-review procedures.2. Concerns about the professional conduct of editors, reviewers, or editorial staff.3. Undisclosed conflicts of interest affecting editorial decisions.4. Alleged breaches of confidentiality, fairness, or the journal's published policies.5. Concerns about the handling of manuscripts or other aspects of editorial management.
Appeals may be submitted by authors who believe that an editorial decision was affected by a material factual error, a significant misunderstanding of the manuscript, a relevant conflict of interest, or a substantial procedural irregularity.
Disagreement with an editorial decision or a reviewer's academic opinion, without specific and substantiated grounds, is not in itself sufficient to justify an appeal.
Authors, reviewers, readers, or other concerned parties may submit complaints and appeals by email to:
ijil.editorial.integrity@uinkhas.ac.id
A complaint should clearly describe the matter in question, identify the relevant individuals or editorial procedures where applicable, and provide supporting information or evidence.
An appeal against an editorial decision should include:1. The manuscript title and manuscript reference number, where applicable.2. The editorial decision that is being challenged.3. Clear reasons for requesting reconsideration.4. Relevant evidence supporting the grounds for appeal.
Submissions should include the sender's name and contact information. Anonymous complaints may be considered where they contain sufficiently specific and credible information to permit an appropriate assessment.
The journal may request further information or clarification when necessary.
Complaints will be assessed by the Editor-in-Chief or a designated editor, depending on the nature of the matter. The journal may review relevant correspondence, editorial records, reviewer reports, and other available evidence. Independent advice may be sought when appropriate.
Individuals whose conduct is the subject of a complaint will not be responsible for making the final determination of that complaint. Where a complaint concerns the Editor-in-Chief, it will be referred to the journal's publisher or an appropriate independent person for impartial consideration.
The journal will seek to handle complaints fairly, confidentially, and without unnecessary delay. The parties concerned may be invited to provide explanations or relevant information before a decision is made.
Authors wishing to appeal an editorial decision must provide a reasoned explanation of the grounds for appeal and any relevant supporting evidence.
An appeal will be assessed by the Editor-in-Chief or an appropriate editor who was not directly responsible for the original decision, where practicable. Independent expert advice may be obtained if necessary.
Following assessment, the journal may:1. Uphold the original decision.2. Reconsider the decision in light of the evidence provided.3. Request an additional independent review or further assessment.4. Take other appropriate procedural action consistent with the journal's editorial policies.
An appeal does not guarantee that the original decision will be changed, that a manuscript will be sent for further review, or that a manuscript will be accepted for publication. The outcome will depend on the merits of the appeal and the evidence available.
Where a complaint raises concerns about possible research misconduct or publication ethics violations, the journal will handle the matter in accordance with its Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement.
If an investigation indicates that action concerning a published article may be necessary, any correction, retraction, expression of concern, or other change to the scholarly record will be considered under IJIL's Retraction and Correction Policy.
Complaints and appeals under this policy are distinct from post-publication scholarly comments and responses, which the journal addresses under its Post-Publication Discussion Policy.
IJIL will handle complaints and appeals with due regard for confidentiality, impartiality, and procedural fairness. Information will be shared only as necessary for assessment, consultation, investigation, or other legitimate purposes consistent with the journal's policies.
The journal will maintain appropriate records of complaints, appeals, the assessment undertaken, and the outcomes reached. Where contact details are available, the person submitting a complaint or appeal will be informed of the outcome, subject to applicable confidentiality considerations.
The journal does not permit retaliation against individuals who submit complaints or appeals in good faith. All parties are expected to act respectfully, provide accurate information, and cooperate with reasonable requests for clarification.
If a matter cannot be resolved internally or requires independent consideration, IJIL may refer it to its publisher, the relevant institution, or another appropriate body.
Any such referral will depend on the nature of the concern, the available evidence, and the applicable procedures.
For complaints, appeals, or enquiries concerning this policy, please contact:Email: ijil.editorial.integrity@uinkhas.ac.idJournal: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law (IJIL)Publisher: Postgraduate Programme, Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember, Indonesia.
Editorial Team Reviewers Contact
Author Guidelines Reviewer Guidelines Privacy Statement Online Submissions Call for Reviewer/Editor
Focus and Scope Peer Review Process Peer Review Policy Publication Frequency Open Access Policy Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement Retraction and Correction Copyright and Licensing Plagiarism Policy Generate AI Policy Archiving Policy Article Processing Charge Revenue Sources, Advertising, and Marketing Policies Indexing and Abstracting
