The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law (IJIL) applies a structured and independent peer review policy to ensure scholarly quality and editorial integrity.• All manuscripts undergo double-blind peer review by a minimum of two independent reviewers with relevant subject expertise.• The Editor-in-Chief holds final responsibility for publication decisions, based on reviewer reports and editorial assessment.• Members of the Editorial Board may provide academic advice and support the review process, without influencing editorial independence or final decisions.• The peer review process is conducted in accordance with the COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers, ensuring confidentiality, objectivity, and integrity.• Reviewer reports are intended to support editorial decision-making and to provide constructive, scholarly feedback to authors.• All submitted manuscripts, peer review reports, and editorial communications are treated as strictly confidential documents. Public generative AI tools must not be used by editors or reviewers to process, evaluate, summarise, or edit submitted manuscripts, peer review reports, or editorial decision letters, as this may compromise confidentiality, data protection, and editorial accountability. Scholarly evaluation, peer review, and editorial decisions remain the sole responsibility of human editors and reviewers.
Focus and Scope Peer Review Process Peer Review Policy Publication Frequency Open Access Policy Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement Retraction and Correction Plagiarism Policy Generate AI Policy Archiving Policy Article Processing Charge
Author Guidelines Reviewer Guidelines Copyright And Licensing Privacy Statement Online Submissions Call For Reviewer/Editor
VISITORS
IJIL's View Statistics
